The Misapplication of Qualified Immunity: Unfair Procedural Burdens for Constitutional Damage Claims Requiring Proof of the Defendant's Intent
Commercial Litigation Partner Clay Pierce's law review note argues that courts should not raise procedural burdens for plaintiffs bringing constitutional damages claims based on the defendant's unlawful intent.
The cite is as follows: The Misapplication of Qualified Immunity: Unfair Burdens for Constitutional Damages Claims Requiring Proof of the Defendant's Intent, 62 Fordham L. Rev. 1769 (1994)
The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.
Meet the Authors
