Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership | This website contains attorney advertising.
Dec-01

Stark II Set In Advance Requirement to be Reconsidered for Percentage Arrangements

On Monday, December 3, 2001, CMS issued an interim final rule with comment period, delaying the effective date of the definition of “set in advance” as set forth in the January 4, 2001, Stark II Phase I regulations. The purpose of the delay is to allow CMS the opportunity to reconsider its position regarding percentage compensation arrangements based upon fluctuating or indeterminate amounts (e.g., gross revenues).

This decision, coming almost one month prior to the effective date of the Phase I final regulations, highlights CMS’s awareness that percentage compensation methodologies are quite common in the  industry and, accordingly, need to be given greater attention to avoid the unnecessary disruption of existing contractual arrangements. Nonetheless, it is important to note that CMS has not abandoned  the “set in advance” requirement for compensation under certain exceptions but, rather, has delayed the application of the prohibition against percentage arrangements.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

Related Legal Services

Related Industries