Updates
April 30, 2010
"Say on Pay" is Coming
This article by Philadelphia partner Doug Raymond and associate John Moore discusses the increasing momentum of the “Say on Pay” trend. Compensation paid to corporate officers almost universally is set by boards of directors, which often have close relationships with officers, without any direct input from the shareholders. The primary purpose of “say on pay” initiatives, however, is to give the company’s shareholders a clear voice on the compensation of the company’s executive officers and to provide a brake on what some shareholders see as excessive compensation practices.
Companies adopting this type of initiative will typically provide shareholders an advisory vote on compensation practices at their annual meeting, which, although non-binding on the boards, can prove very influential if the company has also adopted majority voting requirements for directors. With federal “say on pay” legislation pending and the SEC likely to adopt similar measures in the future, the authors say it’s time for directors and boards to prepare, since it’s “only a matter of time until shareholders get their say on pay.”
Companies adopting this type of initiative will typically provide shareholders an advisory vote on compensation practices at their annual meeting, which, although non-binding on the boards, can prove very influential if the company has also adopted majority voting requirements for directors. With federal “say on pay” legislation pending and the SEC likely to adopt similar measures in the future, the authors say it’s time for directors and boards to prepare, since it’s “only a matter of time until shareholders get their say on pay.”
The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.