Second Circuit Adopts “Meaningful Benchmark” Pleading Standard in ERISA Cases
Spotlight on Benefits blog
In Singh v. Deloitte LLP, et al., No. 23-1108, 2024 WL 5049345 (2d Cir. Dec. 10, 2024), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a district court’s dismissal of a complaint alleging that plan fiduciaries caused an ERISA-governed 401(k) plan to pay excessive recordkeeping fees. This article discusses the Singh case and its impact on excessive-fee claims.
As more and more employers face lawsuits alleging that their 401(k) plans paid excessive recordkeeping and administrative fees, courts continue to grapple with the standard required for plaintiffs to plead plausible claims that survive motions to dismiss. The Second Circuit is the most recent Court of Appeals to adopt the “meaningful benchmark” pleading standard for claims alleging excessive recordkeeping or administrative fees, and it is among the most stringent pleading standards yet.
The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.
Meet the Authors
